President Donald Trump’s push to ban mail-in voting through executive order faces strong resistance from within his own Republican Party, raising doubts about both the legality and practicality of such a move.
At a Glance
- Mail-in ballots accounted for 30% of votes in the 2024 general election
- At least 14 states and D.C. saw more than 30% turnout by mail
- Trump won half of those states, many with GOP-led election offices
- Republican officials caution against a full ban, citing military voters
- Constitutional authority over elections rests largely with states
Trump’s Push Against Mail Voting
Earlier this month, President Trump renewed his criticism of mail-in voting, repeating claims that the method was “corrupt” and suggesting, citing remarks from Russian President Vladimir Putin, that elections could not be honest if mail ballots were used. In an interview with Fox News and in social media posts, Trump indicated he could abolish mail-in voting nationwide through executive action before the 2026 midterms.
Data from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission shows that 30% of all ballots in 2024 were cast by mail. Fourteen states plus the District of Columbia saw turnout levels above that benchmark, and Trump carried half of them, including several under Republican governors and secretaries of state. That record complicates his current push, as Republican candidates in those states have benefited from mail voting.
Watch now: Trump says he’ll sign an executive order to get rid of mail-in voting · NBC News
Party Resistance Builds
Several Republican officials have voiced unease over the idea of eliminating mail ballots altogether. Michigan House Majority Leader Bryan Posthumus, a Trump endorsee, stated that while he views the system as vulnerable, outright abolition is not the solution. Instead, he has pushed for constitutional changes requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration and photo identification to cast ballots.
In Vermont, GOP chair Paul Dame raised concerns that a complete ban would disenfranchise military personnel overseas. Vermont is one of eight states that automatically mails ballots to qualified voters, and Dame argued that reforms to voter rolls would be more effective than elimination. He acknowledged the potential for improvement but rejected Trump’s call for eradication.
Legal and Political Limits
The U.S. Constitution grants states the authority to set the “times, places, and manner” of elections, limiting the president’s power to dictate voting methods. Legal experts and Republican officials alike have questioned whether an executive order could survive judicial review. Even Michigan GOP chair and state senator Jim Runestad, who supports restricting mail ballots, admitted uncertainty over Trump’s legal authority.
Republicans also worry about the political consequences of a ban. States where Trump and other GOP candidates performed well in 2024 rely heavily on mail voting. Curbing the practice could weaken Republican turnout in competitive districts, undermining the party’s chances in 2026. That tension highlights a central challenge: balancing Trump’s push for stricter rules with the electoral realities of mail-in ballot usage.
The Road Ahead
As Trump advances the idea of executive action, Republicans across the country appear divided on how far to go in addressing his concerns. Some embrace measures to tighten mail ballot security, while others advocate preserving the system with reforms. What unites them is skepticism about whether abolishing mail voting is either legally possible or politically wise.
For now, Trump’s proposal remains more a declaration than a definitive plan. Without broad support from his own party — and with constitutional hurdles in the way — the chances of fully banning mail-in voting before the midterms appear slim.
Sources
U.S. Election Assistance Commission
