The Guardian has sparked backlash after offering mental health support to staff struggling with President-elect Donald Trump’s victory. Editor Katharine Viner described the result as “very upsetting” in an email and outlined a range of services to help employees cope, including counseling and virtual wellbeing tools.
British staff received access to mental health resources and online doctors, while U.S. employees were offered Employee Assistance Programs. Australian staff were provided professional counseling. Critics have mocked the measures, calling them an overreaction to a democratic election. Viner’s statement that Trump’s win “could reverberate for a million years” has drawn particular ridicule.
Traumatised Guardian staff offered counselling.
– Guido Fawkes pic.twitter.com/gwanxXEmG3
— L’anglais, c’est rien que le français, malprononcé (@lefoudubaron) November 7, 2024
Viner also encouraged international staff to check in on their American colleagues to provide emotional support. While the Guardian claims these measures are intended to help employees process the election, critics argue that offering formal counseling is excessive and undermines the credibility of the publication.
Adding to the controversy, the Guardian used Trump’s victory as a fundraising tool, urging readers to contribute to “independent journalism” to challenge his administration. This move has been criticized as exploiting political outrage for financial gain, reminiscent of the newspaper’s 2020 campaign supporting Kamala Harris.
The Guardian offers staffers counseling over Donald Trump’s ‘upsetting’ election win.😂
Oh great now the UK is upset 😂😂😂
Katherine Viner, editor-in-chief of The Guardian said her employees can access free mental health support from internal company portals, according to the… pic.twitter.com/hs40JgsDSH
— Denise (@Likeshesays) November 8, 2024
The Guardian has offered its journalists free counseling and mental health support to help them process Donald Trump’s win in the US election, according to an internal email seen by Guido Fawkes, a British political gossip blog
— Dr. Jain (@ncj537) November 8, 2024
The Guardian’s reaction has drawn attention to the increasing partisanship of some media outlets. Critics argue that offering emotional support for political outcomes suggests a lack of professionalism and resilience, damaging public trust in journalism.
As the Guardian attempts to position itself as a leader in “independent journalism,” its dramatic response to Trump’s win raises questions about its ability to cover political developments with balance. For many, the incident underscores the growing divide between media organizations and the audiences they claim to serve.
What marshmellows. Who cares. Now..they're fundraising off of Trump's win..suckering all those brainwashed readers.
Far-Left Guardian Offers Staff Counseling After Trump’s ‘Very Upsetting’ Election Triumph.https://t.co/7Dnx8p8vFy pic.twitter.com/hEubitD4GM
— P. J. Lofland (@pamjlofland) November 7, 2024
You won’t get a reply from the Guardian either….it seems they are too busy attending counseling sessions after the Trump election…..😂😂
— E Nuffsaid (@ENuffsaid59763) November 8, 2024