New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and Attorney General Letitia James recently announced their commitment to “protecting” New Yorkers from potential Trump administration policies, yet their own records on civil liberties have sparked backlash. Critics argue that their stance on defending rights is contradicted by policies they have implemented within their own state.
Hochul introduced the “Empire State Freedom Initiative” as a way to counter federal actions she claims could threaten New Yorkers’ rights in areas such as immigration, labor and LGBTQ+ rights. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Hochul supported strict restrictions, including mandates and proposals for state surveillance, which many saw as infringing on personal freedoms. Her backing of these policies has raised doubts over her dedication to individual rights.
BREAKING: Governor Hochul announces a Ministry Of Truth for students in NY pic.twitter.com/hrXOjS5OV2
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) November 21, 2023
Hochul, James put their embarrassing anti-Trump agenda over New York's needs https://t.co/a9y1Gb3fVi
— Palmer (@Jonijam) November 7, 2024
Attorney General James, known for her aggressive legal pursuits against Trump, joined Hochul in promising to “fight back” against the incoming administration. Critics argue that James’ targeting of Trump over the years suggests a political agenda rather than a genuine interest in justice. Her actions have led to accusations of weaponizing her office for political gain.
NYS..HOCHUL AND JAMES ARE ANTI PRESIDENT TRUMP pic.twitter.com/fMctyyu09u
— ILLEGAL MIGRANT GANGS TERRORIZING CITIZENS (@HoganMikee) November 7, 2024
The Republican leadership in New York voiced its disapproval. GOP chair Ed Cox accused Hochul and James of hypocrisy, questioning how they can claim to stand for rights while supporting restrictive policies that impact everyday New Yorkers. Cox argued that their approach shows a disregard for civil liberties within the state.
Many New Yorkers are skeptical of Hochul and James’ motives, questioning whether their opposition to Trump is rooted in a desire for political confrontation rather than genuine concern for rights. Their recent statements have drawn increased scrutiny, with residents watching closely to see if they truly prioritize freedoms. As they prepare to challenge Trump, Hochul and James face mounting pressure to align their actions with their words.
